-
To what extent is PASS implementing its program process alignment to its proposed logic model and in a way that is responsive to the community and program context?
-
Is PASS committing the necessary resources or inputs to programming?
-
Are all PASS activities occurring as proposed, including both tutoring and ELP?
-
Are participants receiving the proposed amount of outputs (i.e., hours of programming received by participating students)?
-
-
What are the patterns in outcomes of participating students?
-
Are students participating in PASS gaining knowledge and skills needed for active engagement in school and learning?
-
Are students participating in PASS making academic gains in the desired content areas?
-
-
What is the estimated impact of PASS ELP on student engagement in school compared to similar students not in PASS?
- A vast majority of staff indicated that the tutoring program was well-organized, shows alignment to district priorities, and uses quality tutoring strategies. A large majority of staff also thought the program was culturally and linguistically relevant and thought the program works well in coordinating its activities.
- Overall, several sources suggest a positive outcome in the knowledge and skills needed for active engagement in school and learning associated with the program. While there are also perceptions of some academic gains for students, quantitative student-level data show mixed results.
- The findings show a positive impact of the program on attendance every year compared to the control group with statistically significant positive impacts in eighth grade in all years, seventh grade in 2016-17 and 2017-18, and sixth grade in 2017-18. The size of the significant impact ranged from approximately 1.5 to 2.0 higher percentage points in attendance rate.
For more information, download:
Full report
Further information
Dane County Human Services